4 ms·
OP should ask the LLM they used to write the post about what their chances are in court, given they already went all in on LLMs building the rest of the stack.
by OsrsNeedsf2P 10mo ago
OP should ask the LLM they used to write the post about what their chances are in court, given they already went all in on LLMs building the rest of the stack. Here's the ToS[0] btw
[0] https://stackblitz.com/terms-of-service https://stackblitz.com/terms-of-service
- therealcapi 10mo ago. TOS Cannot Legalize Negligence: No terms of service can shield a company from liability for its own gross negligence, fraudulent misrepresentation, or failure to deliver the core service paid for. These are well-established exceptions to limitation of liability clauses. 2. Their Breach is the Issue: This isn't about a bug or downtime. It's about their platform making unauthorized, destructive changes that consumed all prepaid resources and delivered a fundamentally broken product—a clear breach of the core service agreement itself. 3. The Real Legal Question: The question isn't if I read the TOS. It's whether their TOS can legally excuse systematically destroying a customer's project and then ignoring it. I'm comfortable letting the FTC, the CA Attorney General, and potentially a court answer that."