6 ms·
That would not be analogous at all. An analogous example would be if you made an artificial human organ that (supposedly) serves an identical function, but is d
by atakan_gurkan 14y ago
That would not be analogous at all. An analogous example would be if you made an artificial human organ that (supposedly) serves an identical function, but is different enough that it is immune to certain diseases.
- mhb 14y agoamalag was suggesting that there is a contradiction because Monsanto is claiming protection because they have invented something which is 'unique' and yet 'not significantly different'. The analogy I suggested refutes that. Your suggestion that there may, in fact, be aspects of Monsanto's invention which make it different from what it replaces does not bear on amalag's original inquiry.