3 ms·
> they have shipped tons of great features for the DevEx Such as? > again I’m not saying Codex is worse, they’re just different and claiming the only one you
by koakuma-chan 10mo ago
> they have shipped tons of great features for the DevEx
Such as?
> again I’m not saying Codex is worse, they’re just different and claiming the only one you actively use is the best is a stretch
I am testing all models in Cursor.
> I initially dismissed Claude Code at launch, then loved Codex when it released. never really liked Cursor
I also don't actually like Cursor. It's a VSCode fork, and a mediocre harness. I am only using it because my company refuses to buy anything else, because Cursor has all models, and it appears to them that it's not worth having anything else.
- dkdcio 10mo agoyou conveniently ignored the most important part of my comment :) > Such as? changelog is here: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/blob/main/CHANGELO... glhf btw you started this thread with pure vibes, no evidence: > I can confirm GPT 5.2 is better than Gemini and Claude. GPT 5.2 Codex is probably even better. I’m saying you’re wrong. N=2, 1 against 1, one of us is making a much less bold claim
- koakuma-chan 10mo agoYou do not seem to be able to tell me anything substantial, i.e. specifically how Claude Code is a better harness than Cursor. > “prompting”/harness that improves how it actually performs Is an abstract statement without any meaningful details.