4 ms·

I feel inspired and would like to donate my standard for Agent Personas to the community. A persona can be defined by a markdown file with the following frontma

I feel inspired and would like to donate my standard for Agent Personas to the community. A persona can be defined by a markdown file with the following frontmatter: --- persona: hacker description: logical, talks about computers a lot, enjoys coffee, somewhat snarky and arrogant --- <more details here>

brap 10mo ago
Give this man a Turing Award
acedTrex 10mo ago
Have you considered publishing this with a few charts about vague levels of "correctness"?
- rvz 10mo ago
  What is "correctness?"... wait hang on let me think... "you're absolutely right!"
oblio 10mo ago
> logical Please tell us how REALLY feel about JavaScript.
allisdust 10mo ago
Please consider donating this to the Linux Foundation so they can drive this inspiring innovation forward.
InitialLastName 10mo ago
Luckily you get the "extremely confident, even when wrong" attribute for free.
- sshine 10mo ago
  But always willing to admit the opposite is true and go with that on a whim.
weitendorf 10mo ago
announcing md2ai spec
deleted 10mo ago
[deleted]
lxgr 10mo ago
This isn’t just a standard—this is a templating system that could offer us a straight shot to AGI!
- deleted 10mo ago
  [deleted]
falcor84 10mo ago
I have a few qualms about this standard: 1. For an experienced Claude Code user, you can already build such an agent persona quite trivially by using the /agents settings. 2. It doesn't actually replace agents. Most people I know use pre-defined agents for some tasks, but they still want the ability to create ad-hoc agents for specific needs. Your standard, by requiring them to write markdown files does not solve this ad-hoc issue. 3. It does not seem very "viral" or income-generating. I know this is premature at this point, but without charging users for the standard, is it reasonable to expect to make money off of this?
zikani_03 10mo ago
absolutely revolutionary! ;)
baobun 10mo ago
As groundbreaking as this is, it will never get traction without a LICENSE.md.

brap 10mo ago

Give this man a Turing Award

acedTrex 10mo ago

Have you considered publishing this with a few charts about vague levels of "correctness"?

rvz 10mo ago
What is "correctness?"... wait hang on let me think... "you're absolutely right!"

oblio 10mo ago

> logical Please tell us how REALLY feel about JavaScript.

allisdust 10mo ago

Please consider donating this to the Linux Foundation so they can drive this inspiring innovation forward.

InitialLastName 10mo ago

Luckily you get the "extremely confident, even when wrong" attribute for free.

sshine 10mo ago
But always willing to admit the opposite is true and go with that on a whim.

weitendorf 10mo ago

announcing md2ai spec

deleted 10mo ago

[deleted]

lxgr 10mo ago

This isn’t just a standard—this is a templating system that could offer us a straight shot to AGI!

deleted 10mo ago
[deleted]

falcor84 10mo ago

I have a few qualms about this standard: 1. For an experienced Claude Code user, you can already build such an agent persona quite trivially by using the /agents settings. 2. It doesn't actually replace agents. Most people I know use pre-defined agents for some tasks, but they still want the ability to create ad-hoc agents for specific needs. Your standard, by requiring them to write markdown files does not solve this ad-hoc issue. 3. It does not seem very "viral" or income-generating. I know this is premature at this point, but without charging users for the standard, is it reasonable to expect to make money off of this?

zikani_03 10mo ago

absolutely revolutionary! ;)

baobun 10mo ago

As groundbreaking as this is, it will never get traction without a LICENSE.md.