4 ms·
"it is in conflict with wikipedia" is a wild thing to read.
by ahmeneeroe-v2 10mo ago
"it is in conflict with wikipedia" is a wild thing to read.
- y-c-o-m-b 10mo agoTo be fair, the entire chain of this thread is lacking any sources. Wikipedia at least contains sources, despite its relative inaccuracies and questionable authenticity of those sources. "in conflict with wikipedia" seems somewhat reasonable at this junction until someone rises above that bar.