4 ms·
You're looking in the wrong place. They don't need to be listening for mail on the machine behind the A/AAAA records for the domain, because they have an MX rec
by MrDOS 10mo ago
You're looking in the wrong place. They don't need to be listening for mail on the machine behind the A/AAAA records for the domain, because they have an MX record indicating that mail should be delivered elsewhere:
$ dig MX gmai.com +short
1 mail.h-email.net.
Port 25 is very rare these days, as it implies the possibility of unencrypted traffic; legitimate SMTP traffic uses port 587. That said, I checked a couple of the hosts that that name resolves to, and they all listen for both SMTP and secure SMTP traffic:
$ nmap -p 25,587 mail.h-email.net
Starting Nmap 7.95 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2025-12-18 16:31 UTC
Nmap scan report for mail.h-email.net (165.227.159.144)
Host is up (0.093s latency).
Other addresses for mail.h-email.net (not scanned): 91.107.214.206 165.227.156.49 167.235.143.33 5.75.171.74 5.161.194.135 178.62.199.248 5.161.98.212 162.55.164.116 49.13.4.90
rDNS record for 165.227.159.144: mail2.h-email.net
PORT STATE SERVICE
25/tcp open smtp
587/tcp open submission
- johndoeee 10mo agomail.h-email.net is a Spamhaus spamtrap. As far as I've been able to research, these typesquatting domain traps started at the same time as Spamhaus CSS blacklist which was actually a company called Deteque. If the MX has a large number of Hetzner IPs as mailservers, then it's probably Spamhaus.
- MrDOS 10mo agoAh, neat – that certainly makes me feel a bit better, then.
- phsau 10mo agoPort 25 is only uncommon for client submission, but prevalent for MTA>MTA traffic.