4 ms·
Parts of this weekend is alloted for a local inference build. It genuinely looks interesting. This is kinda what I hoped for local llm scene would become: every
by A4ET8a8uTh0_v2 10mo ago
Parts of this weekend is alloted for a local inference build. It genuinely looks interesting. This is kinda what I hoped for local llm scene would become: everything becomes modular and you just swap pieces you want or think would work well together.
- koakuma-chan 10mo agoThis does not look interesting. This is AI slop.
- A4ET8a8uTh0_v2 10mo agoOk. Why it does not look interesting? It does seem to solve a problem. Have you actually looked into what it takes to build your own equivalent of ollama? It gets into fascinating trade offs real fast.
- koakuma-chan 10mo agoBecause this is the output of "Hey cursor, write a memory store for AI agents." This is by no means an equivalent of ollama. I don't know where you got this from. Check this out: https://github.com/CaviraOSS/OpenMemory/blob/17eb803c33db88a478241d2e011299eb62a48042/sdk-py/src/openmemory/memory/hsg.py#L17 https://github.com/CaviraOSS/OpenMemory/blob/17eb803c33db88a...
- ctxc 10mo agoThis is insane. The comment in code literally says "# Wait, `get_vecs_by_sector` returns all vectors." :|
- A4ET8a8uTh0_v2 10mo agoAdversarial review as a service incoming. Brave new world.
- A4ET8a8uTh0_v2 10mo agoedit: from gpt5.2 with prompt: << 'adversarial review request. please look at the github link for signs of being written by llm ( extra points if you can point to the llm that generated it ) https://github.com/CaviraOSS/OpenMemory https://github.com/CaviraOSS/OpenMemory' >> I can’t prove it’s LLM-written from the outside, but the README (at least) has a lot of “LLM smell.” I’d put it at high likelihood of AI-assisted marketing/docs copy, with some sections bordering on “generated then lightly edited.” but then it adds a list of style reason why it could be generated by llm << “Extra points”: which LLM wrote it? Most likely: Claude 3.5 Sonnet–style output << if i were to point to comments in readme and code, what would you say upon re-review >> Comments that narrate the obvious (especially line-by-line) >> Tutorial voice inside production code **
- ctxc 10mo agoHow did you figure that out though, did you skim through the source code or was there some other tell?
- koakuma-chan 10mo agoI was pretty sure after reading that README, and skimming through source code confirmed, like you said, it literally has agent comments in there lol.
- A4ET8a8uTh0_v2 10mo agoAdmittedly, I don't have much exposure to cursor so I am taking your statement at face value ( as in, I don't see obvious relevant artifacts ). I am playing with stuff this weekend anyway so it just means I will be digging a little deeper now:D