3 ms·
OK, he's wrong. But is that enough to state that he "doesn't seem to think that women have any role to play in his profession"?
by mariusor 10mo ago
OK, he's wrong. But is that enough to state that he "doesn't seem to think that women have any role to play in his profession"?
- __alexs 10mo agoI don't think he's said exactly that in his own words but I think on balance it's fair to say he doesn't seem welcoming about it. He clearly has right leaning and libertarian views, and seems to be not very articulate or sensitive in how he discusses them so I can see why people might read into that more than they should maybe.
- psyopsy 10mo agoThekla currently has 10 core permanent employees. 5 of them are women, including their studio manager, creative and art Director, a programmer, and 2 additional artists. You can say whatever the hell you want. Or you could spend 3 minutes actually looking at public information to see if you're wrong.
- __alexs 10mo agoI don't think these statements are contradictory.
- psyopsy 10mo agoHalf his employees are women—including leadership, programming, and creative roles. If that doesn’t count as “thinking women have a role,” what would? 51%? 90%? You’re relying on blatant social media mischaracterizations over real actions. He actually employs women at parity. You feel like this is unwelcoming. One of those statements is data. The other is fanfic.
- __alexs 10mo agoI didn't say he thinks women don't have a role.
- psyopsy 10mo agoYou said, "I don't think he's said exactly that in his own words but..." That's implicitly saying, "well, he hasn't admitted it outright, but yeah, he basically believes it." Now faced with evidence contrary to your beliefs, you're claiming you didn't say that. When presented with proof, It's ok to just admit that you were wrong.
- __alexs 10mo agoYou seem very defensive of Blow. I didn't say the things you seem to think I was saying. Sorry for the confusion.
- psyopsy 10mo agoAm I supposed to be embarrassed for defending someone against a baseless smear? Anyway, call it "defensive" all you want. It doesn't change the historical thread: You argued, at best, his views made the workplace unwelcoming; the data shows he hires women at parity. You're just backpedaling because the reality didn't match your narrative vibes.