4 ms·

At best this would be 1.7x more _discovered_ bugs. The average PR (IMO) is hardly checked. AI could have 10x as many real issues on PRs, but we're just bad at

by 0x3f 10mo ago

At best this would be 1.7x more _discovered_ bugs. The average PR (IMO) is hardly checked. AI could have 10x as many real issues on PRs, but we're just bad at reviewing PRs.

core-utility 10mo ago
Couldn't this be true in the other direction as well? Anecdotally I see developers putting a lot more scrutiny into vibe coded PRs, while AI code tends to be highly commented (by the AI) and potentially easier to read. I've seen way more human comments of "I don't know what this does but if I remove it everything breaks" in systems.
maerF0x0 10mo ago
It's been suggested that code reviews shouldnt be about finding bugs, because they do not really work well for that goal. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/PID3556473.pdf https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/...