3 ms·

The second paragraph of the linked article?

• armitron 10mo ago
  [flagged]
  • perching_aix 10mo ago
    > a basic biological fact > looks inside > opinion He literally tells you that it's his bellyfeel: "I believe it is likely that (...)". Come on...
    • armitron 10mo ago
      [flagged]
      • fnimick 10mo ago
        It's a "biological fact" that women are less interested in technology?
      • ookdatnog 10mo ago
        > one that every practicing biologist would agree with Where are you getting this from? As far as I'm aware biologists, practicing or not, are not particularly concerned with the study of human behavior.
      • deleted 10mo ago
        [deleted]
      • djeastm 10mo ago
        >the same opinion being an uncontroversial fact in biology, I'm confused is it opinion or fact? Can't be both, can it?
• jabbywocker 10mo ago
  The Reddit link didn’t load for some reason and the other day be didn’t include anything racist, homophobic or transphobic. What it did cover is definitely a simplistic view ignoring the cultural nuances that might lower women’s participation in stem, but I’m not sure I’d classify it as sexist.
  • IAmBroom 10mo ago
    He suggests women are biologically less capable than men in STEM. But I note you didn't include misogyny as a problematic belief.
    • miltonlost 10mo ago
      I wonder what his take on the differences of IQ among races are. Bet it's also as "enlightening"
    • jabbywocker 10mo ago
      Maybe I read it wrong but I took it as him saying women are “naturally” less interested in STEM not that they are less capable in the area. And I’d say that misogyny falls under “sexist” in the list of problematic stuff
    • psyopsy 10mo ago
      [flagged]