4 ms·
Agreed, I stopped reading at that point. You can't take yourself seriously to create a report and use LOC as your measure. I feel like we humans try to separat
by hvb2 10mo ago
Agreed, I stopped reading at that point. You can't take yourself seriously to create a report and use LOC as your measure.
I feel like we humans try to separate things and keep things short. We do this not because we think it's pretty, we do it so our human brains can still reason about a big system. As a result LOC is a bad measure as being concise then hurts your productivity????
- dakshgupta 10mo agoWe're careful not to draw any conclusions from LoC. The fact is LoCs are higher, which by itself is interesting. This could be a good or bad thing depending on code quality, which itself varied wildly person-to-person and agent-to-agent.
- mrdependable 10mo agoCan you expand on why it is interesting?
- zed31726 10mo agoBecause it's different. Change is important to track
- hvb2 10mo agoWhen the heading above it says "Developer output increased by x" I think you're very much drawing conclusions