2 ms·

This feels not very different from the recent report revealing how Nick Fuentes has a lot of artificial likes and comments on videos that push his content, due

This feels not very different from the recent report revealing how Nick Fuentes has a lot of artificial likes and comments on videos that push his content, due to a large following that responds to commands delivered via Telegram etc. A VC backed corporation using a large phone farm to manipulate the public is no better than Nick Fuentes.

jbm 11mo ago
[flagged]
- buellerbueller 11mo ago
  Reddit wasn't explicitly pushing white nationalism. Furthermore: reddit is a platform; Fuentes is content. That's a meaningful difference.
songodongo 11mo ago
[flagged]
- jrflowers 11mo ago
  >The organization that recently released the report alleging the contrary is the same one that released that report earlier this year claiming that if you say “Christ is King” then you’re a white supremacist. No, Rutgers University did not publish a report that says “if you say ‘Christ is King’ then you’re a white supremacist”. You can read about it here, it’s only 20 pages and well-sourced. https://networkcontagion.us/reports/3-13-25-thy-name-in-vain-how-online-extremists-hijacked-christ-is-king/ https://networkcontagion.us/reports/3-13-25-thy-name-in-vain...
  - SilverElfin 11mo ago
    Even if they said that, why would it be dismissed casually? There may be good justification to associate the two. It’s clear the phrase has flooded X this year alongside a lot of supremacist stuff.