3 ms·
> This is the hill you want to die on? That being a bigot should be a protected status for CEOs? That is a wildly uncharitable take. I'm not OP, but I believe
by bigstrat2003 11mo ago
> This is the hill you want to die on? That being a bigot should be a protected status for CEOs?
That is a wildly uncharitable take. I'm not OP, but I believe that nobody, CEOs or otherwise, should be fired for their activities outside of work. That can be political beliefs, but doesn't have to be either. And yes, that means that sometimes someone whose beliefs you find repugnant is going to have a good job. That is the price of a free society, and I think it's worth it.
- pavel_lishin 11mo ago> That is the price of a free society, and I think it's worth it. A society free enough to fund hatred, but not one free enough for employers to make decisions based on that?
- array_key_first 11mo agoIt's a business decision. Imagine, instead, the opinion he expressed outside of work is that Firefox sucks and nobody should use it. Should he be fired then? As a CEO, your opinion and perspective is MARKETING. You determine if customers stay or leave. And causing customers to leave is obviously a fireable offense.
- dweinus 11mo agoSo Subway should bring back Jared and Jello should bring back Cosby? Freedom is not a one-way street that guarantees the right to be awful without social consequences.
- deleted 11mo ago[deleted]