2 ms·

You really... really.... really are wrong here. Reality vs propoganda needs to be known

komali2 10mo ago
What are you reading that we're not? The PRC seems to be leading in building new green energy sources. It's not like I'm a fan of them - I live in Taiwan - but credit where it's due.
- lazide 10mo ago
  Leading is in no way actually replacing. And that isn’t even counting major economic factors like international shipping, where we are approximately 1% towards replacement.
bdangubic 10mo ago
hehehe yea, for sure that’s it
bdangubic 10mo ago
few things you can read https://archive.ph/J0bew https://archive.ph/J0bew https://www.economist.com/leaders/2025/11/06/chinas-clean-energy-revolution-will-reshape-markets-and-politics https://www.economist.com/leaders/2025/11/06/chinas-clean-en... https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-14/trump-us-xi-china-trade-renewables-tariffs/105526196 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-14/trump-us-xi-china-tra... https://huabinoliver.substack.com/p/what-is-really-going-to-change-the https://huabinoliver.substack.com/p/what-is-really-going-to-...
- lazide 10mo ago
  None of it actually addresses the points, and is quite literally propaganda when the CCP is the one who states what the internal numbers are and mean? (Which notably, is where the US is going very rapidly now too).
  - bdangubic 10mo ago
    it specifically addresses the entire world economy is based on fossil fuels, and attempting to redo the entire worlds economy to use non-fossil fuels is not currently doable - it is currently doable - china is working on it - they will succeed - while we flip the two insane political parties in power every 4 to 8 years that each kills everything previous one did just out of spite if for no other reason
    - lazide 10mo ago
      They’ll make some progress - while also burning massive amounts of fossil fuels, sure. And maybe in 20+ years we’ll be closer. But that is not the same as what was being discussed.

What are you reading that we're not? The PRC seems to be leading in building new green energy sources. It's not like I'm a fan of them - I live in Taiwan - but credit where it's due.

lazide 10mo ago
Leading is in no way actually replacing. And that isn’t even counting major economic factors like international shipping, where we are approximately 1% towards replacement.

bdangubic 10mo ago

hehehe yea, for sure that’s it

bdangubic 10mo ago

few things you can read https://archive.ph/J0bew https://archive.ph/J0bew https://www.economist.com/leaders/2025/11/06/chinas-clean-energy-revolution-will-reshape-markets-and-politics https://www.economist.com/leaders/2025/11/06/chinas-clean-en... https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-14/trump-us-xi-china-trade-renewables-tariffs/105526196 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-14/trump-us-xi-china-tra... https://huabinoliver.substack.com/p/what-is-really-going-to-change-the https://huabinoliver.substack.com/p/what-is-really-going-to-...

lazide 10mo ago
None of it actually addresses the points, and is quite literally propaganda when the CCP is the one who states what the internal numbers are and mean? (Which notably, is where the US is going very rapidly now too).
- bdangubic 10mo ago
  it specifically addresses the entire world economy is based on fossil fuels, and attempting to redo the entire worlds economy to use non-fossil fuels is not currently doable - it is currently doable - china is working on it - they will succeed - while we flip the two insane political parties in power every 4 to 8 years that each kills everything previous one did just out of spite if for no other reason
  - lazide 10mo ago
    They’ll make some progress - while also burning massive amounts of fossil fuels, sure. And maybe in 20+ years we’ll be closer. But that is not the same as what was being discussed.