4 ms·

Yep. I’ll die on the hill. Engineer and designers. That’s all we really need. We started with a very very small team and did all the heavy lifting. Then they s

Yep. I’ll die on the hill. Engineer and designers. That’s all we really need. We started with a very very small team and did all the heavy lifting. Then they started adding PM, marketing, market people, HR, … We were striving when we were not drowning in meetings, KPIs, management, emails, …

mmooss 10mo ago
Who provides resources to the Es and Ds? Who hires new ones? Who raises money from investors and banks, and ensures you have cash flow and ROI? How do you manage 100 Es and Ds without a PM? Small teams are more efficient but (obviously) can't produce at scale. When you scale up, there's enough HR or finance or marketing, or PM, etc. work for full-time specialists. And larger orgs need bureaucracy - if you have a way around that, the world is yours.
- waz0wski 10mo ago
  What you call scaling up sounds more like monetization. Others (especially customers) might call it enshittification instead. Youtube is a great example of how bad it can get. Why Mozilla won't let people financially contribute directly to Firefox development and continues to pursue these stupid monetization paths is a mystery.
  - mmooss 10mo ago
    I mean scaling up - growing the organization.
    - account42 10mo ago
      That should not be a goal of a nonprofit. The goal should be to make a browser, not a vehicle to justify the CEO's obscene salary.
      - mmooss 10mo ago
        lol - you are really looking for a fight.