3 ms·
Not impressed because when tried ruff, and discovered that it doesn't replace (basic) pylint check https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/970 https://github.c
by almanael 10mo ago
Not impressed because when tried ruff, and discovered that it doesn't replace (basic) pylint check https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/970 https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/970 so we have ruff then pylint (and looking at the number of awaiting PR of ruff feels bad)
- zanie 10mo agoAs noted in the linked issue > At time of writing, many of the remaining rules require type inference and/or multi-file analysis, and aren't ready to be implemented in Ruff. ty is actually a big step in this direction as it provides multi-file analysis and type inference. (I work at Astral)
- int_19h 10mo agoAre you guys planning to tackle Python debugging next? pydevd could really use a fast native rewrite targeting modern Python.
- caidan 10mo agoRuff is incredible, replacing a mountain of tools and rules with a single extremely fast linter/formatter. Given that it is updated and improved frequently, I’m curious if you have tried it recently, and if so what pylint rules are you using that it doesn’t cover?