3 ms·

I am very impressed a benchmark I like to run is have it create sprite maps, uv texture maps for an imagined 3d model Noticed it captured a megaman legends vib

I am very impressed a benchmark I like to run is have it create sprite maps, uv texture maps for an imagined 3d model Noticed it captured a megaman legends vibe .... https://x.com/AgentifySH/status/2001037332770615302 https://x.com/AgentifySH/status/2001037332770615302 and here it generated a texture map from a 3d character https://x.com/AgentifySH/status/2001038516067672390/photo/1 https://x.com/AgentifySH/status/2001038516067672390/photo/1 however im not sure if these are true uv maps that is accurate as i dont have the 3d models itself but ive tried this in nano banana when it first came out and it couldn't do it

gs17 10mo ago
> however im not sure if these are true uv maps I can tell you with 100% certainty they are not. For example, Crash doesn't have a backside for his torso. You could definitely make a model that uses these as textures, but you'd really have to force it and a lot of it would be stretched or look weird. If you want to go this approach, it would make a lot more sense to make a model, unwrap it, and use the wireframe UV map as input. Here's the original Crash model: https://models.spriters-resource.com/pc_computer/crashbandicootthensanetrilogy/asset/314827/ https://models.spriters-resource.com/pc_computer/crashbandic... , its actual texture is nothing like the generated one, because the real one was designed for efficiency.
- agentifysh 10mo ago
  yeah definitely impressive compared to what nano banana outputted tried your suggested approach by unwrapaped wireframe uv as input and im impressed https://x.com/AgentifySH/status/2001057153235222867 https://x.com/AgentifySH/status/2001057153235222867 obviously its not going to be accurate 1:1 but with more 3d spatial awareness i think it could definitely improve
- Nition 10mo ago
  That's a remake model in a modern game. The original Crash was even simpler than that one. Most of Crash in the first game was not textured; just vertex colours. Only the fur on his back and his shoelaces were textures at all.
  - gs17 10mo ago
    "Original" as in the original of the one they used in their tweet.
101008 10mo ago
> however im not sure if these are true uv maps that is accurate as i dont have the 3d models itself also in the tweet > GPT Image 1.5 is **ing crazy and > holy shit lol what's impressive if you don't know if it's right or not (as the other comment pointed out, it is not right)

gs17 10mo ago

> however im not sure if these are true uv maps I can tell you with 100% certainty they are not. For example, Crash doesn't have a backside for his torso. You could definitely make a model that uses these as textures, but you'd really have to force it and a lot of it would be stretched or look weird. If you want to go this approach, it would make a lot more sense to make a model, unwrap it, and use the wireframe UV map as input. Here's the original Crash model: https://models.spriters-resource.com/pc_computer/crashbandicootthensanetrilogy/asset/314827/ https://models.spriters-resource.com/pc_computer/crashbandic... , its actual texture is nothing like the generated one, because the real one was designed for efficiency.

agentifysh 10mo ago
yeah definitely impressive compared to what nano banana outputted tried your suggested approach by unwrapaped wireframe uv as input and im impressed https://x.com/AgentifySH/status/2001057153235222867 https://x.com/AgentifySH/status/2001057153235222867 obviously its not going to be accurate 1:1 but with more 3d spatial awareness i think it could definitely improve
Nition 10mo ago
That's a remake model in a modern game. The original Crash was even simpler than that one. Most of Crash in the first game was not textured; just vertex colours. Only the fur on his back and his shoelaces were textures at all.
- gs17 10mo ago
  "Original" as in the original of the one they used in their tweet.

101008 10mo ago

> however im not sure if these are true uv maps that is accurate as i dont have the 3d models itself also in the tweet > GPT Image 1.5 is **ing crazy and > holy shit lol what's impressive if you don't know if it's right or not (as the other comment pointed out, it is not right)