2 ms·
Cameras could do it if: * they were positioned for stereopsis like the human visual system * had 6 degrees of motion freedom like the human visual system * w
by BugsJustFindMe 10mo ago
Cameras could do it if:
* they were positioned for stereopsis like the human visual system
* had 6 degrees of motion freedom like the human visual system
* were hyper-adaptive to lighting conditions like the human visual system
* had a significantly higher density of pixels per degree of arc in the focus region like the human visual system
* and were backed by a system capable of intuiting object inertia like the human visual system.
Tesla does none of those.
- SirMaster 10mo agoEven if cameras can do it, it feels wrong to not use tech that can do it better that vision alone. Even if it costs more, it should still be used because these are machines that can kill people, and life is too valuable. If it can't be done the best we can, then maybe it shouldn't be done at all yet.
- thejazzman 10mo agoSome people live in brick houses and others in trailers or worse. It’s just not how the reality of the world works. The reality is we’re lucky to even have the luxury of a warm trailer relative to the chaos and pain of nature.
- dzhiurgis 10mo ago> feels wrong Reductio ad absurdum. EVs are safer, why we haven't banned ICE vehicles yet? How about screening every food item in supermarket for chemicals and pathogens. Surely that will minimize excess death? Lot's of things can be "best we can", ask yourself why it's not done yet.
- ksclarke 10mo agoThe corporation's risk assessment department has calculated it's more cost effective to deny and then fight the consequences in court vs. spend the extra money up front?
- SR2Z 10mo agoFor Tesla!? It's because Musk is a combination of stubborn and cheap. That's it - he wants to collect FSD subscriptions or that $10k purchase price without spending any extra money. Perhaps he can figure it out. It won't be in the next few years.