3 ms·
That's actually $90/month, that's kind of crazy. I realise 100% utilisation isn't realistic, but that still sounds very expensive when you're already BYOB.
by xnorswap 10mo ago
That's actually $90/month, that's kind of crazy.
I realise 100% utilisation isn't realistic, but that still sounds very expensive when you're already BYOB.
- BugsJustFindMe 10mo ago> I realise 100% utilisation isn't realistic It's worse than unrealistic. It's ludicrous. Any company running more than an hour of actions workflows per week on GitHub can afford a few dollars a month for infrastructure. The per-minute charge is less than the cost of a millisecond of engineering labor time.
- Elidrake24 10mo agoMonorepo, though Gitlab, self-hosted runner, 41 hours in the last week.
- BugsJustFindMe 10mo agoTell me that $20/month is a notable amount of expense for your business spending 41 hours per week on workflows. Go on.
- bigstrat2003 10mo agoDude why are you so determined to defend this pricing change? You're all over this thread arguing with people that it's not a big deal. If it's a big deal to them, why do you give a shit? It's not like it's your problem if people take their business elsewhere for a poor reason.
- paulddraper 10mo agoThis increases our CI compute costs by 30%.
- timvdalen 10mo agoWe'd be at roughly $700/month at current usage.