2 ms·
They are arguing that nepotism caused the lack of abundance, instead of the lack of abundance causing the nepotism as you are arguing.
by layer8 11mo ago
They are arguing that nepotism caused the lack of abundance, instead of the lack of abundance causing the nepotism as you are arguing.
- jack_tripper 11mo agoBoth are true. Because when the abundance runs out, people start using nepotism to get what they need. You can see it in the tech job market now. More and more good jobs are only through networking. Meritocracy alone was enough during the times of abundance.