3 ms·
I'd like to read your sources on that, because from what I checked in the meantime it looks like it's more of a “culture war” thing that a real thing. See: http
by littlestymaar 11mo ago
I'd like to read your sources on that, because from what I checked in the meantime it looks like it's more of a “culture war” thing that a real thing. See: https://www.sdkrashen.com/content/articles/great_plummet.pdf https://www.sdkrashen.com/content/articles/great_plummet.pdf which provides figures for tests results between 1984 and 1990 showing no such decline over that period.
Also, the PDF I quoted is from 2002, 10 years after California had legislated in favor of phonics in 1992 (which had never stopped to be used no matter what the urban legend says).
- danaris 11mo agoEr...what? The change I'm talking about happened in the mid-to-late 2000s. Nothing from the periods you cite are relevant. Here's one of the articles that's been written about the three-cueing model: https://www.apmreports.org/episode/2019/08/22/whats-wrong-how-schools-teach-reading https://www.apmreports.org/episode/2019/08/22/whats-wrong-ho... If you want more, you have the search terms.
- littlestymaar 11mo agoYou realize that your link talks about the same time period as mine, and not about something that allegedly happened in the “mid to late 2000”? > Goodman's three-cueing idea formed the theoretical basis of an approach known as "whole language" that by the late 1980s had taken hold throughout America.