A reliable AI image detector would be useful, with "reliable" being the operative word. It is impossible to identify AI images reliably with current techniques.

A reliable AI image detector would be useful, with "reliable" being the operative word. It is impossible to identify AI images reliably with current techniques. "The detector scans the signatures within files" makes zero sense. I tried some knowingly AI-generated images and it only predicted a 55% chance they were AI, with the rationale being "Extremely uniform byte distribution - may indicate encrypted or random data" which also makes zero sense.