3 ms·
nowindows
- welcome_dragon 10mo agoI dunno. Just use a different license then? You can't have free software and then limit what people can do with it
- darubedarob 10mo agoWhy not? The containment strategy worked on imperial systems before?
- SebastianKra 10mo agoAnd also don’t tip your waiters because that just helps the owner /s. I work in a Windows-dependent company, and would very much like to see all MS-products thrown out. Withholding features is ignorant and will make everyone’s lives miserable. Users won’t see it as a problem with Microsoft, they might not see it as a problem at all, they will just quietly suffer. A slightly better path is to guide users to standardized, open applications on Windows. Then, an admin might have an easier time eventually pulling the cord without breaking too many workflows.
- yjftsjthsd-h 10mo agoAs a single anecdote, I will say that when I personally migrated from Windows to Linux, it was a lot easier because I was already using mostly FOSS applications. It turns out, if you use Windows to run Firefox and Libreoffice and whatever, there's a lot less friction to using Linux to run Firefox and Libreoffice and whatever:)
- didgetmaster 10mo agoThe open source world is littered with all kinds of specialized licenses that came about because a developer once said "Here is my source code. Do anything you like with it! ... wait! Except for that!". I don't know if there is, but I wouldn't be surprised if there is a license available that restricts you from porting the code to MS Windows or any other proprietary OS.
- dpc_01234 10mo agoThis does not seem to be a license, only a plea.
- sapphirebreeze 10mo ago[dead]