3 ms·

"Please try to be empathetic and look the other way as your civilization is being raped and murdered into oblivion. Die kindly." You... you think this sentimen

"Please try to be empathetic and look the other way as your civilization is being raped and murdered into oblivion. Die kindly." You... you think this sentiment is *not* representative of white nationalism? Really? Can you maybe fill in the blanks here? Who is doing the "raping"? Why is "Western civilization" purportedly coming to an end? And when DHH says something like: "In 2000, more than sixty percent of the city were native Brits. By 2024, that had dropped to about a third. A statistic as evident as day when you walk the streets of London now." Could you perhaps explain to me what he might mean by "native Brit"? You know what, I actually don't believe for a second that you're being honest here. You know exactly what this is but you don't want other people to name it. But that's OK: we'll name it for you. Feel free to wear it around your neck.

throwawaypath 10mo ago
>Could you perhaps explain to me what he might mean by "native Brit"? English people, which are White Brits, are the only Brits native to London. The English are the indigenous ethnic group to London.
- dragonwriter 10mo ago
  Britons are indigenous, Anglos and other “White Brits” are invaders. Of course, separating them out at this point has become difficult.
  - deleted 10mo ago
    [deleted]
  - throwawaypath 10mo ago
    >Britons are indigenous, Anglos and other “White Brits” are invaders. Categorically false. "The English people are an ethnic group [...] native to England." [0] "[White Brits] is an ethnicity classification used for the White population identifying as English..." [1] The English are the native and indigenous ethnic group to England (London). White Brits are a category that includes the English. >Of course, separating them out at this point has become difficult. There is no separation nor difficulty: English people are the indigenous and native group to London. QED. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_people https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_people [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_British# https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_British#
- tastyface 10mo ago
  In other words, exactly what I pointed out: DHH is saying that London is not white enough for his tastes. Nonwhites with British citizenship, apparently, aren’t "real" Londoners or Brits. White nationalists should own their scummy politics instead of pretending we’re all idiots.
  - deleted 10mo ago
    [deleted]
  - throwawaypath 10mo ago
    >In other words, exactly what I pointed out What you're "pointing out" is your failure of understanding what words mean. >DHH is saying that London is not white enough for his tastes. DHH explicitly said "native Brits," not "White people." Russians may be "White," but are not "native Brits." London wouldn't feel like London if it was 60% Russian. >Nonwhites with British citizenship, apparently, aren’t "real" Londoners or Brits. They are by definition not "native Brits." >White nationalists should own their scummy politics instead of pretending we’re all idiots. Nothing he stated is White nationalist. There's nothing wrong with promoting or protecting the interests of native/indigenous people over those of immigrants or foreigners.
    - tastyface 10mo ago
      London is a melting pot and a global city. Always has been, always will be. The "natives" have no more of a right to it than British nationals with familial roots outside the UK. (Who, by the way, are not "immigrants" or "foreigners". Many are second or third generation Brits.) If the "natives" don't like it, they can self-deport to a more cloistered town. Good bye. And this type of nativist is never, ever consistent. Ask them how they feel about, for example, Native Americans' claim to the US and they'll invariably say, "well, the colonials won, tough luck." Somehow, whites always come out on top. Funny how that works... Anyway, since this is clearly not a case of white nationalism, feel free to drop the sockpuppet and own your words! But I don't think you're being honest. The subtext in DHH's post is blatantly, blaringly obvious to anyone with an ounce of reading comprehension: https://jakelazaroff.com/words/dhh-is-way-worse-than-i-thought/ https://jakelazaroff.com/words/dhh-is-way-worse-than-i-thoug...

throwawaypath 10mo ago

>Could you perhaps explain to me what he might mean by "native Brit"? English people, which are White Brits, are the only Brits native to London. The English are the indigenous ethnic group to London.

dragonwriter 10mo ago
Britons are indigenous, Anglos and other “White Brits” are invaders. Of course, separating them out at this point has become difficult.
- deleted 10mo ago
  [deleted]
- throwawaypath 10mo ago
  >Britons are indigenous, Anglos and other “White Brits” are invaders. Categorically false. "The English people are an ethnic group [...] native to England." [0] "[White Brits] is an ethnicity classification used for the White population identifying as English..." [1] The English are the native and indigenous ethnic group to England (London). White Brits are a category that includes the English. >Of course, separating them out at this point has become difficult. There is no separation nor difficulty: English people are the indigenous and native group to London. QED. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_people https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_people [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_British# https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_British#
tastyface 10mo ago
In other words, exactly what I pointed out: DHH is saying that London is not white enough for his tastes. Nonwhites with British citizenship, apparently, aren’t "real" Londoners or Brits. White nationalists should own their scummy politics instead of pretending we’re all idiots.
- deleted 10mo ago
  [deleted]
- throwawaypath 10mo ago
  >In other words, exactly what I pointed out What you're "pointing out" is your failure of understanding what words mean. >DHH is saying that London is not white enough for his tastes. DHH explicitly said "native Brits," not "White people." Russians may be "White," but are not "native Brits." London wouldn't feel like London if it was 60% Russian. >Nonwhites with British citizenship, apparently, aren’t "real" Londoners or Brits. They are by definition not "native Brits." >White nationalists should own their scummy politics instead of pretending we’re all idiots. Nothing he stated is White nationalist. There's nothing wrong with promoting or protecting the interests of native/indigenous people over those of immigrants or foreigners.
  - tastyface 10mo ago
    London is a melting pot and a global city. Always has been, always will be. The "natives" have no more of a right to it than British nationals with familial roots outside the UK. (Who, by the way, are not "immigrants" or "foreigners". Many are second or third generation Brits.) If the "natives" don't like it, they can self-deport to a more cloistered town. Good bye. And this type of nativist is never, ever consistent. Ask them how they feel about, for example, Native Americans' claim to the US and they'll invariably say, "well, the colonials won, tough luck." Somehow, whites always come out on top. Funny how that works... Anyway, since this is clearly not a case of white nationalism, feel free to drop the sockpuppet and own your words! But I don't think you're being honest. The subtext in DHH's post is blatantly, blaringly obvious to anyone with an ounce of reading comprehension: https://jakelazaroff.com/words/dhh-is-way-worse-than-i-thought/ https://jakelazaroff.com/words/dhh-is-way-worse-than-i-thoug...