4 ms·
This feels like it needs a MAGA vs Republican distinction. There are plenty of Republicans who (privately) have issues with some things Trump is doing.
by ethbr1 11mo ago
This feels like it needs a MAGA vs Republican distinction. There are plenty of Republicans who (privately) have issues with some things Trump is doing.
- usefulcat 11mo agoTalk is cheap; actions are what matters. Based on their actions (or lack thereof), the group you're describing must be a very small minority indeed.
- amanaplanacanal 11mo agoThey aren't in Congress, they are working in the states, I would guess. The Republicans in Congress mostly volunteered for a spinectomy when Trump was elected again.
- platevoltage 11mo agoCan you name any currently serving?
- ethbr1 11mo agoThat's part of it: many felt the winds and simultaneously made the choice to "focus on family" and step back from politics during the 2nd Trump administration. But the wheel turns, and there's going to be a lot of folks in the party with very sharp axes to grind during the lame duck period.
- deleted 11mo ago[deleted]
- platevoltage 11mo agoYeah, and I'm sure the Pelosi wing of the Democratic Party will be first in line to help rehabilitate their image.
- deleted 11mo ago[deleted]
- lovich 11mo agoThat distinction ended when Romney left Congress. It’s entirely MAGA now. It’s not even historically rare for a party to merge or be subsumed like that. Here’s the historical list just for the US https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_parties_in_the_United_States https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_parties_in_t...
- thfuran 11mo agoTen years ago, that distinction may have been a valid one.
- kelnos 11mo agoIf you keep your issues with Trump private, you're complicit with those who follow him blindly.
- platevoltage 11mo agoAbsolutely not. Almost every non-MAGA Republican voice that served in federal public office has been ousted, and it's not like they were good to begin with.
- undeveloper 11mo agoby and large the "anti-trump republican" has ceased to be a relevant political bloc. they have either vote for trump / pro trump candidates and are functionally indistinguishable from MAGA, vote for the most moderate democrat possible, or have given up politics entirely. I suspect you didn't mean this, but the largest group of self identified republicans who have an issue with trump are angry he isn't far right enough (ie groypers, klansmen, neonazis, and like).
- raw_anon_1111 11mo agoThe meme is that Susan Collins is “always concerned”. But still votes along with the MAGAs. If they are silently going along, what difference does it make? They are still MAGA.
- ethbr1 11mo agoThe difference comes when Trump needs help but no longer wields power. His dyed in the wool followers will still support him. The convenience crowd? I wouldn't take that bet. Especially after he's been such a dick to so many folks in his own party. But we'll see.
- raw_anon_1111 11mo agoNo one except the Freedom Caucus in the House are true MAGA to their core the rest are just opportunists. I’m not sure who are the true believers in the Senate.
- ethbr1 11mo agoI get the sense that Republican senators have always been more willing to see this administration as a passing tide. E.g. Thune's propensity for letting Trump's more excessive ideas die on the vine.
- beezlewax 11mo agoNo. Having issues with them privately and not speaking out is half of the problem.