5 ms·
> The GNOME project disagrees with this vulnerability report because, according to their stated security model, untrusted applications must not be allowed to co
by 1718627440 11mo ago
> The GNOME project disagrees with this vulnerability report because, according to their stated security model, untrusted applications must not be allowed to communicate with the secret service.
> Applications sandboxed via Flatpak only have filtered access to the session bus.
While I see why they think this is a bad answer it really reminds me of this: https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20060508-22/?p=31283 https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20060508-22/?p=31... . Also they did not cite the last statement in their quote and made screenshots, so the quotes are not copyable. Who the hell does that?
- ottah 11mo agoWayland, thow shall not screenshot without root. D-Bus, YOLo!
- 1718627440 11mo agoI am not a fan of Wayland either, I rather want to be able to run programs from different users against the same application server. This works just fine on Xorg.
- seba_dos1 11mo agoWorks just fine on Wayland as well. It's simply a Unix socket that you can set permissions for, it's even easier than X11 with its magic cookies.