It's always been biased, but during SCO / IBM, it seemed like there was more fact-based reporting based on the exhibits from the case. This is the first time th

It's always been biased, but during SCO / IBM, it seemed like there was more fact-based reporting based on the exhibits from the case. This is the first time that I remember them going after a person, especially one that was part of the court proceedings (jury), and not a plaintiff/defendant. It seems very hypocritical to go after the jury foreman so voraciously when PJ was so protective of her private life. I'm sure they published things about McBride, but at least he was part of the suit.