3 ms·
> A direct equivalent, no, as stated in the introduction ... of https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-64235-y https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-6
by aleph_minus_one 11mo ago
> A direct equivalent, no, as stated in the introduction
... of https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-64235-y https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-64235-y
- supernetworks 11mo agoyes, this paper is the main subject of the article
- aleph_minus_one 11mo agoThe article links two papers (text: "Two recent papers underscore that potential."): - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41928-025-01439-6 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41928-025-01439-6 (link text: "In one study") - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-64235-y https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-64235-y (link text: "In the most recent paper")
- supernetworks 11mo agoyes understood, the first article isn't the main subject of the article.