2 ms·
I'm not saying you have to believe it, just that rhetorically asking if it's more than 5,000 in the US is redundant when the article already says there are more
by zamadatix 11mo ago
I'm not saying you have to believe it, just that rhetorically asking if it's more than 5,000 in the US is redundant when the article already says there are more than that many individual cases about it in a single district court.
- mathgradthrow 11mo agoI drastically underestimated the number of farmers, who skew older. This is very unlikely to be anything.
- zamadatix 11mo agoIs that just stating a hunch or do you have new data outside the 2 narratives presented in the article driving that?