4 ms·
Groklaw has been pretty much heavily biased right from inception. It's just that you're noticing it now because it's no longer in alignment with your own biases
by cooldeal 14y ago
Groklaw has been pretty much heavily biased right from inception. It's just that you're noticing it now because it's no longer in alignment with your own biases in the Apple case.
- mbreese 14y agoIt's always been biased, but during SCO / IBM, it seemed like there was more fact-based reporting based on the exhibits from the case. This is the first time that I remember them going after a person, especially one that was part of the court proceedings (jury), and not a plaintiff/defendant. It seems very hypocritical to go after the jury foreman so voraciously when PJ was so protective of her private life. I'm sure they published things about McBride, but at least he was part of the suit.
- shardling 14y agoSamsungs is appealing based on the foreman's personal ties to Seagate. That's why all this stuff is being talked about now. (He didn't disclose during jury selection that he had been involved in a lawsuit against Seagate, which is primarily owned by Samsung.)