6 ms·
Chromebooks and iPads are both completely unsuitable for digital education in my opinion. They can be decent tools for education using digital resources, but th
by raxxorraxor 10mo ago
Chromebooks and iPads are both completely unsuitable for digital education in my opinion. They can be decent tools for education using digital resources, but that is something different.
To "force" someone to develop on a Chromebook is like giving someone a bicycle to become a race car driver.
That said, I usually flashed my arduinos and used bare metal C. Ironically I think it makes many things easier to learn and understand, provided you have a programming device.
- AlexeyBrin 10mo agoYou really can't compare a Chromebook with an iPad. On a Chromebook that I bought and that I fully own I can enable the Linux system and install whatever I want on it (it runs in a VM and it is a full Linux system). The iPad is artificially crippled for programming by Apple.
- evilduck 10mo agoYour personally owned Chromebook isn’t comparable to a school issued Chromebook at all. They’re more locked down and useless than a stock iPad. Kids cannot install Linux on them.
- AlexeyBrin 10mo agoThis is why I said "that I fully own". I said nothing about a school issued Chromebook because I never touched one of these.
- evilduck 10mo agoYou commented in context of digital education. The point is that your argument of Chromebooks comparing better to iPads doesn't apply in this situation. In fact they're often worse because schools deploy the cheapest, lowest common denominator Chromebooks with slow CPUs, horrible screen resolutions, inadequate RAM and terrible battery life. Kids hate them. The fact that good and uncrippled Chromebooks exists doesn't help them at all. A 5 year old iPad is likely a better experience and a more capable OS and device than a new Chromebook issued to students this fall, but the warranty and repair costs for schools dealing with careless kids don't add up to less so they get the cheaper option.
- organsnyder 10mo agoSchool IT departments are unlikely to allow this. Even if they don't have technical restrictions, they'll have policies that prohibit it (at least my kids' school district would). School-issued devices are generally intended to be similar to devices a corporation would provision for non-technical workers.
- AlexeyBrin 10mo agoHonest question, if you buy (just a hypothetical, I assume most parents can't afford to buy one) a Chromebook for your kid that will be used in school, do you have to lock it down or can you enable the Linux system (assuming that you want to do that and that your kid is interested in learning to program).
- evilduck 10mo agoSchools typically don't allow BYOD policies because of support costs and equitability between students. Assuming a school district even did allow this, they would only allow the student to use a managed Chrome profile and the school's device policy would lock out the Linux VM option and everything else that might become an in-class distraction. If a kid wants to learn how to program, they're going to have to bring their own separate computer and it will be treated about the same as bringing their smartphone to class, i.e. not allowed except during very specific times, there would be concerns about liability of damage or theft from other students, and they probably wouldn't allow it on the school networks.
- kldg 10mo agoCan confirm no-BYOD policy is typical. I had to whine directly and without invitation to school principal to get an exemption for daughter. The trouble with no-BYOD is the kid must bring the school-controlled Chromebook home and connect to the home network for homework (which often requires Chromebook). Many US middle and high schools have an IT department of 1 or 2 people; it introduces abuse risk I think schools in general are not appreciating. I see the problem with Chromebooks and cloud stuff more generally as being that it's difficult to see the productive use-case of programming outside just shuffling a bunch of data around. If your program's not actually doing something useful, it seems like it'd be difficult to imagine a career in it. -But if a kid can get a relay to trigger via button and then maybe via web interface and then maybe automate it, I think that opens the world of hacking up to them. You know, for $10, they can have a fully-solar (w/battery) thermometer or whatever they want -- the thermometer can feed a thermostat to energize a relay coil to start a heater or whatever. -But I might be outlier, because in school we had robotics class a lot of kids were pumped for, but I was confused because we never did anything useful with them; it was more like an art class, except at least in art class we baked ashtrays for our parents. -But what am I supposed to do with a 5-watt robot that follows yellow tape?
- hulitu 10mo ago> On a Chromebook that I bought and that I fully own I can enable the Linux system and install whatever I want on it (it runs in a VM and it is a full Linux system). Do you really own it ? Can you install linux or BSD _instead_ of ChromeOS ?
- AlexeyBrin 10mo ago(My original comment was about about running a Linux VM inside ChromeOS.) To answer your questions, it depends. On some Chromebook models you can wipe ChromeOS and install Linux.
- officeplant 10mo agoYes[1], depending on the chromebook / chrometablet it will have varying levels of support for even swapping the firmware and running standard linux/BSD. Sometimes you will need to open up the laptop for a jumper/screw to adjust for enabling firmware flashing. Others its just turning on dev mode first. [1]https://docs.mrchromebox.tech/docs/supported-devices.html https://docs.mrchromebox.tech/docs/supported-devices.html
- thadt 10mo agoWhat does a "digital education" look like, specifically? Having spent several years teaching kids to code everything from games to lightbulbs on Chromebooks, I can confirm that there are certainly difficulties - but they're tradeoffs. I could spend my time coming up with a way to work through the platform restrictions, or I could spend my time maintaining a motley crew of devices and configurations. Having done it both ways, they both have different pain points.
- oneplane 10mo agoI think the comment mainly pointed out the distinction between education using digital methods, vs. educating about digital things.
- FuriouslyAdrift 10mo agoLong long time ago in the classes I took, it was PIC16/32, breadboards, Forth, PLCs, ladder logic, etc. More recently, kids can have a ton of fun programming STM32, making DACs, audio gear, robots, etc.
- GeekyBear 10mo agoApple has long provided tools for teaching kids how to code. Including lessons targeted at kids in middle schools. > young coders are asked to assist these characters achieving simple goals by coding simple instructions. As challenges become more difficult, more complex algorithms are required to solve them and new concepts are introduced. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swift_Playgrounds https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swift_Playgrounds
- assbuttbuttass 10mo ago> To "force" someone to develop on a Chromebook is like giving someone a bicycle to become a race car driver. Lol, I use a Chromebook for development at work
- evilduck 10mo agoYour work Chromebook is completely incomparable to a school issued Chromebook. It's doubtful that your employer locks you out of literally everything that would allow you to develop software on-device. See my other comments in this thread.
- aleph_minus_one 10mo ago> It's doubtful that your employer locks you out of literally everything that would allow you to develop software on-device. In strongly regulated industries, it is not unusual that you are indeed strongly locked out of this, and you need to create special requests to get access to the specific functionalities (as an exception) that you need for developing software on-device.
- evilduck 10mo agoRight, many people have to treat their local computer as a thin-client and do everything through a WebEx session or similar means, which makes the local device irrelevant. Or if you're regulated but have to be specifically exempted and allowed to work in a way that schools would never permit, then in that case you'd not be arguing in good faith that kids are able to learn to code and develop on a Chromebook since they can't.
- aleph_minus_one 10mo ago> Or if you're regulated but have to be specifically exempted and allowed to work in a way that schools would never permit, then in that case you'd not be arguing in good faith that kids are able to learn to code and develop on a Chromebook since they can't. No, I just wanted to show that your claim > It's doubtful that your employer locks you out of literally everything that would allow you to develop software on-device. See my other comments in this thread. simply does not hold in practice. -- Addendum: Additionally, from my school experience, rather the attempts to circumvent "abitrary" restrictions on the computers which were set up by the school made you a good coder. :-)
- galleywest200 10mo agoIf your digital education is at an art school then an iPad with creative software is great. If you mean computer science then yes you are correct.
- AuthAuth 10mo agoEven then an ipad is not good. An Ipad is good for digital art and thats it. For the same money you can buy a computer capable of 3d modeling, digital art and a drawing tablet buy some paint brushes and clay to do real life art.
- mips_avatar 10mo agomore like giving them a speed limited citi bike and expecting them to train for cyclocross.