5 ms·
Apple was probably concerned with the security implications of providing Safari with access to the local file system.
by russtrpkovski 14y ago
Apple was probably concerned with the security implications of providing Safari with access to the local file system.
- pooriaazimi 14y agoNo, they weren't! They just wanted to force all major websites to create an iOS app as well. Now that there are 750.000+ apps in the App Store, they can give web a long-overdue break. They still don't give websites access to camera feed (read or frontal), among other things, so you can't use a website to make a video conference.
- objclxt 14y ago...given that Mobile Safari has been around longer than the app store I'm not sure that's strictly true. And let's be honest, Android support for direct camera access through getUserMedia is pretty ropey at best. Neither platform is at a state where it's usable by the masses.
- mikeklaas 14y agoYeah, the shipped the best and most performant mobile browser for years, but omitted one small feature that no-one has implemented well for nefarious purposes.
- drivebyacct2 14y agoWhat OS/DE does not have a toolkit just for creating File Open dialogs?
- dmorgan 14y agoAndroid didn't have it at first too. What other mobile OS matters?
- drivebyacct2 14y agoAndroid implemented it years ago. My point was simply that "one small feature that no-one has implemented well" is pretty much revisionist nonsense.
- dmorgan 14y ago>They still don't give websites access to camera feed (read or frontal), among other things, so you can't use a website to make a video conference. And they will NOT do it until the battery, CPU power et al are there to support it running on the browser in the way a random website wants to handle it.