I agree, but that is nothing new. The original SaaS was already proprietary. And btw, the "reverse engineering" close was already here too. You can check the a

I agree, but that is nothing new. The original SaaS was already proprietary. And btw, the "reverse engineering" close was already here too. You can check the archive.org of Jan 2025, months before the Qualcomm acquisition. https://web.archive.org/web/20250120145427/https://www.arduino.cc/en/terms-conditions https://web.archive.org/web/20250120145427/https://www.ardui... So this citation, is basically fake news and FUD. The *now* part is false and this hide the fact that the "platform" is only the SaaS. > Phillip Torrone had warned [...] Arduino’s users were now “explicitly forbidden from reverse engineering or even attempting to understand how the platform works unless Arduino gives permission.”