2 ms·
Typical defense against this is to mount all user-writable filesystems as `noexec` but unfortunately most OSes don't do that out of the box.
by otterley 11mo ago
Typical defense against this is to mount all user-writable filesystems as `noexec` but unfortunately most OSes don't do that out of the box.
- mr_mitm 11mo agoIt could have created a bash alias then. And I don't think a dev wants to be restricted in creating executables. Again, if a dev can do it, so can the malware.
- dividuum 11mo agoI remember you could trivially circumvent that with „/lib/ld-linux.so <executable>“. Does that no longer work?
- lights0123 11mo agonoexec now prevents mmaping files on that filesystem as executable.
- LtWorf 11mo agoKinda hard to work as a software developer then.