4 ms·

> I convert that to digital time in my head What? They are the same thing.

• Telaneo 10mo ago
  Not to other people I've talked to. I'm the wrong person to ask this about, since I prefer digital time, so time is just a number to me. But Technology Connections made a video atleast talking about it,[1] so hopefully that get part of the point across. To him and plenty of other analogue-first people, time is a progress bar, or a chart, or something along those lines, and that's the natural way to perceive time, and converting it to a number is meaningless beyond expressing it as digital time. [1] https://youtu.be/NeopkvAP-ag https://youtu.be/NeopkvAP-ag
  • wkat4242 10mo ago
    Totally agree. I do the same. The only reason we have analog clocks is because digital ones were much harder to build. That time is of course over for good. It was a compromise imposed by limited technology.
    • 1718627440 10mo ago
      Not really, analog clocks are readable over a much longer distance, because seeing an angle needs much less information, than parsing glyphs.
      • Telaneo 10mo ago
        Tell that to my glasses. At any sort of distance where this could be an advantage, the clock is just going to be a blur anyway. Not to mention, how often are you in a situation where you want to know what time it is, but the nearest clock is far enough away that it being analogue becomes an actual advantage?
        • 1718627440 10mo ago
          Interesting, I also have glasses and am short-sighted, but for me light-emitting objects blur much faster than solid objects. It depends very much on the light type, frequency and brightness, but most LEDs, which most digital clocks use, tend to have an overgleaming effect, which makes them unreadable due to being a block of light. > Not to mention, how often are you in a situation where you want to know what time it is, but the nearest clock is far enough away that it being analogue becomes an actual advantage? All the time? Being in a train station, sitting in a (class)room (during exam), in the kitchen, walking on the street, etc.
          • Telaneo 10mo ago
            > All the time? Being in a train station, Phone. Or a wristwatch if you're that type. > a (class)room (during exam), My last 7+ exams were all done on a computer. That clock was a lot closer than any that happen to be on a wall. > in the kitchen, walking on the street, etc. Phone. Or wristwatch again.
            • 1718627440 10mo ago
              > Phone. Or a wristwatch if you're that type. Sure, but why would I look down, when there is a clock in every direction I look at. I wristwatch would also be analog again. > My last 7+ exams were all done on a computer. That clock was a lot closer than any that happen to be on a wall. I have no clue how your university does prevent cheating, but ok. Here any kind of network-connected(/connectable) device is forbidden. And then there is math, where the only thing you are allowed to have is a pen and the formulary (and maybe a ruler).
              • Telaneo 10mo ago
                > when there is a clock in every direction I look at. This does not reflect my life. Clocks are out there, but not to the point of there being one a just turn of the head away no matter where I am. My phone is the closest device with an accurate sense of time the vast majority of the time. > wristwatch would also be analog again. Smart watches exist. Digital wrist watches also exist, but seem to have gone out of fashion. > I have no clue how your university does prevent cheating, By not having shit exams. Most (all?) of mine were open-book. I didn't take maths in uni, but they're also done digitally, although I don't think they're open-book. There you probably only get the formulary.
  • 1718627440 10mo ago
    To me time is somehow both, but more so an analog thing. It is a multimodular linear scale, that turns logarithmic, the moment I focus on any specific point.