4 ms·
Sounds like their claim was technically-correct and you even acknowledged it... I don't see a problem with DDG itself in this aspect. Why do you feel that the
by majorchord 10mo ago
Sounds like their claim was technically-correct and you even acknowledged it... I don't see a problem with DDG itself in this aspect.
Why do you feel that the actions of a search provider(s) should be reflected so negatively and angrily on the aggregator?
- SV_BubbleTime 10mo agoYou used technically-correct, and I used to technically-bullshit. We can both be right. The difference what he is intending to convey when they say they’re proud their product lacks censorship and is banned in China. It’s not like anyone can go and see the CCP scoresheet for DDG.