If you really want to hire the "best and brightest" it should be worth paying the 100K fee to bring that 'talent' into the US if that equivalent skill can't be

If you really want to hire the "best and brightest" it should be worth paying the 100K fee to bring that 'talent' into the US if that equivalent skill can't be found in the US. Instead these companies will just layoff Americans and relocate their tech offices in the one country (India) that takes up more than 75% of the H1B pool. (I wonder why?) Is the 75% of that pool really the most elite "best and brightest" such that it warrants not hiring a US citizen? Or is the true reason that the purchasing power of a US employee is far higher than a H1B from India as long as they're cheap and can be overworked since rebelling means deportation which you can't do to a US citizen? Those preaching "best and brightest" were also the same ones offshoring their critical technologies and secrets overseas to the low quality engineers just to cuts costs. What it actually does it causes billion dollar problems.