2 ms·
The problem is not a personal hardware security module, as you noted we have them. The problem is that people want redundancy that undermines the point. If you
by BaconVonPork 10mo ago
The problem is not a personal hardware security module, as you noted we have them. The problem is that people want redundancy that undermines the point. If you can easily have a copy of your ring just in case, how do you know who has done that process and watches you all the time? Biometrics sounds like a solution yet they are implemented as a cosmetic security layer and this situation is pointless to fix since we leave them everywhere we go.
- tonyhart7 10mo agoif people want to copy then let them copy -how is that secure???? we would let only 1 device active at a time if you think secure enclave with Biometric security is "weak" then no one is secure if you think combination of (fingerprint,DNA,blood variance,retina, star time + position, mental memory etc) is not enough then no one is enough (we are assuming this is future where we can access all this technology) << this is important point here also if this is not enough, ppffttt (I dont want to go here) Neuralink device that lives under your skin