3 ms·
The military's new AI says boat strike 'unambiguously illegal'
- Kim_Bruning 11mo agohttps://www.reddit.com/r/AirForce/comments/1pijkwc/secdefgpt/ https://www.reddit.com/r/AirForce/comments/1pijkwc/secdefgpt... relevant thread on reddit
- krapp 11mo agoI didn't have "Skynet has moral objections to American military policy" on my 2025 bingo card...
- Steven420 11mo agoThe prompt did not include the fact that Trump declared them to be terrorists which I believe is what makes that kind of attack legal. If they are enemy combatants you are allowed to follow up and ensure they have been killed
- BaconVonPork 11mo agoHow is that different than the Nuremberg defense in combination with Hitler declaring Jews subhuman? One can claim Trump knowingly committed an international crime by declaring someone a terrorist when it would result in the US' criminality but the people involved are also guilty.
- andriamanitra 11mo ago> If they are enemy combatants you are allowed to follow up and ensure they have been killed Not true. Launching an attack on shipwrecked enemy is a blatant violation of the Geneva conventions. [1, Chapter II Article 12] It's also prohibited by DoD's own guidelines. [2, page 1071, section 17.14] It's not a question of whether or not what happened was illegal, it's a textbook example of a war crime. It's a matter of whether or not the justice system still has enough power to identify who is responsible and hold them accountable. [1] https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/assets/treaties/370-GC-II-EN.pdf https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/assets/treaties/370-GC-II-EN.... [2] https://media.defense.gov/2023/Jul/31/2003271432/-1/-1/0/DOD-LAW-OF-WAR-MANUAL-JUNE-2015-UPDATED-JULY%202023.PDF https://media.defense.gov/2023/Jul/31/2003271432/-1/-1/0/DOD...