4 ms·
So that gets to how it differs, but it doesn't say its not a cellular automata. It could say "it's a cellular automata with different rules"
by ggm 11mo ago
So that gets to how it differs, but it doesn't say its not a cellular automata. It could say "it's a cellular automata with different rules"
- gsf_emergency_6 11mo agoIt is a cellular automata distinguished by commutativity. You used CGL as the basis for comparison, that's highly nonAbelian. According to Wolfram (& I agree :), everything is a cellular automaton, so comparing to CGL made more sense to me.