3 ms·
Provocative title with a much more reasoned lede. I'm pretty sure a set of workshops isn't ACTUALLY going to solve a problem that philosophers have been at eac
by Kim_Bruning 11mo ago
Provocative title with a much more reasoned lede.
I'm pretty sure a set of workshops isn't ACTUALLY going to solve a problem that philosophers have been at each other's throats for for the past half century.
But BOY does it get people talking!
Both sides of the debate have capital-O Opinions, and how else did you want to drum up interest for a set of mathematics workshops. O:-)
- dang 11mo agoYes, that word 'think' is a hell of a distraction. We've replaced that bit of the title with a less provocative / more interesting phrase from the article. Hopefully we can talk about the actual math and stuff (although the article doesn't go into much of that).
- t23414321 11mo agoartificial intelligence in place of artificial knowledge is confusing distraction too, at least artificial is a good reminder since beginning (IMHO its not provocative but well catching a point.. about so called "intelligence" - what if we could look for intelligent knowledge - made in not statistic but semantic(?) and converging way - instead - of being distracted, afraid and.. outpriced, peanuts for the essence it doesn't have ?)
- deleted 11mo ago[deleted]
- deleted 11mo ago[deleted]
- deleted 11mo ago[deleted]
- deleted 11mo ago[deleted]
- fatata123 11mo ago[dead]