3 ms·
This would be a fantastic argument against rust for the m68k or some other embedded architecture. But we live in a world with an actual rust compiler for basica
by MangoToupe 10mo ago
This would be a fantastic argument against rust for the m68k or some other embedded architecture. But we live in a world with an actual rust compiler for basically all architectures tor serves. & obviously the c standard can't save c from itself.
- yjdiquhf 10mo ago[flagged]
- MangoToupe 10mo ago> Yet you are wrong Ahh here you are speaking nonsense again. We ain't talking formal logic, we're speaking human to human > For instance, building a large project in a language with only one major compiler, can introduce risk. Ok let's introduce an alternative to gcc then > But Steve Klabnik will lie about that You seem fine to both tarnish the reputation of, erm, c defenders with your own actions and to slander the reputation of Klabnik (or "lie" as I'm sure you'd term it), who both speaks more coherently and with his own name. Why do this in the name of open source if you have nothing to contribute, knowing that you're setting your own project back?
- steveklabnik 10mo agoI literally said on here two days ago that I thought that in the past the Project was hostile to gccrs: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46219460 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46219460 I have been a fan of gccrs the entire time.