It’s probably precisely because his browser is not customized that it’s not easily fingerprintable, because stock Safari has privacy protections and users gener

It’s probably precisely because his browser is not customized that it’s not easily fingerprintable, because stock Safari has privacy protections and users generally don’t change anything. I got a very similar result on unmodified iOS Safari, randomized among 380k users and conveying 15.5 bits of information. I only have the Dark Reader extension.