4 ms·
I understand it’s “damaging”, but how stable is it? CO2 is bad because it doesn’t just go away. Methane, while being more “damaging”, eventually breaks down in
by montjoy 10mo ago
I understand it’s “damaging”, but how stable is it? CO2 is bad because it doesn’t just go away. Methane, while being more “damaging”, eventually breaks down into CO2 and water.
- hrimfaxi 10mo ago> Over a 100-year period, SF6 is 23,500 times more effective at trapping infrared radiation than an equivalent amount of carbon dioxide (CO2). SF6 is also a very stable chemical, with an atmospheric lifetime of greater than 1,000 years. https://www.epa.gov/eps-partnership/sulfur-hexafluoride-sf6-basics https://www.epa.gov/eps-partnership/sulfur-hexafluoride-sf6-...
- moralestapia 10mo agoThe "damage" part of damage already accounts for that.
- scotty79 10mo agoWhen F grabs onto something it ususally never lets go.