3 ms·
Considering the original title is just the name of the railway, and I do not think “within budget” is editorializing, I think the commenter is being overly peda
by bigbinary 10mo ago
Considering the original title is just the name of the railway, and I do not think “within budget” is editorializing, I think the commenter is being overly pedantic
- franciscop 10mo agoI opened the article expecting to see news about the budget and how they stayed within it, since that SEEMS like the biggest surprising news in a project like this. How is that overly pedantic?
- tchalla 10mo agoI understand your expectation. That said, I think it's ok to add detail in commentary when the article doesn't mention it explicitly. So continuing to go upon the point that the article didn't mention the budget makes you seem as pedantic. There are non-English articles on the budget too. https://orf.at/stories/3414173/ https://orf.at/stories/3414173/
- b112 10mo agoTheir point was completely valid. HN policies are what help keep this place sane.
- deleted 10mo ago[deleted]
- paulgerhardt 10mo agoI was curious about the forecasting success story here too. The German LOK article is better in this regard: https://www.lok-report.de/news/europa/item/62410-oesterreich-koralmbahn-punktlandung-bei-investitionskosten.html https://www.lok-report.de/news/europa/item/62410-oesterreich...