3 ms·
Wouldn't make more sense keeping React smaller and left those features to frameworks? I liked it more when it was marketed as the View in MVC. Surely can still
by hollowturtle 10mo ago
Wouldn't make more sense keeping React smaller and left those features to frameworks? I liked it more when it was marketed as the View in MVC. Surely can still be used like that today but it still feels bloated
- ivanjermakov 10mo agogit checkout v15.0.0 There we go.
- hollowturtle 10mo agoCan I have v15 with the rendering optimizations of further versions?
- TZubiri 10mo agoBut the react-components are a separate library, they are not installed by default
- hollowturtle 10mo ago? afaik react server components made it to core
- silverwind 10mo agoThey shouldn't be loaded in a React SPA at least, e.g. `react-dom` and `react` packages should be unaffected.
- TZubiri 10mo agoSo they are part of the standard distribution (like through npm install react), but are unused by default? Something like that?
- danabramov 10mo agoThis code doesn’t exist in `react` or `react-dom`, no. Packages are released in lockstep to avoid confusion which is why everything got a version bump. The vulnerable packages are the ones starting with `react-server-` (like `react-server-dom-webpack') or anything that vendors their code (like `next` does).