3 ms·
at the moment, we don't support 'loops in loops' on the client-side, but not for any other reason asides from it becoming confusing for users. since we don't ac
by waleedlatif1 10mo ago
at the moment, we don't support 'loops in loops' on the client-side, but not for any other reason asides from it becoming confusing for users. since we don't actually make copies for each loop, it wouldn't be a performance issue.