4 ms·
Clearly, you didn't even look at the article yesterday, nor any of the comments nor any of the replies to your run and gun comment. That 90 item list was near
by twmb 14y ago
Clearly, you didn't even look at the article yesterday, nor any of the comments nor any of the replies to your run and gun comment. That 90 item list was near universally praised.
There are times when people need to expand their attention to read more than a page of writing.
Not everything can be explained so succinctly. Books exist for a reason.
I agree that people need to to be able to explain their companies and what they do in one paragraph - at a high level. But that is a skill that is easily honed by an afternoon of thought... no need to be so dismissive.
- lutusp 14y ago> Clearly, you didn't even look at the article yesterday ... The problem isn't that I didn't read the article. The problem is that I did. The author should have been renamed Captain Obvious. > That 90 item list was near universally praised. I wasn't the only one to point out that it had 80 points too many, or words to that effect. > Not everything can be explained so succinctly. Books exist for a reason. But it wasn't a book, it was an online article. > But that is a skill that is easily honed by an afternoon of thought... no need to be so dismissive. My post wasn't dismissive, it was critical, and the criticism was legitimate.