I agree that it should work as you describe. But there's always a danger of courts making a broad ruling. The norm seems to be for content purveyors to push for

I agree that it should work as you describe. But there's always a danger of courts making a broad ruling. The norm seems to be for content purveyors to push for a broad ruling, as it's in their business interest. Edit: the particulars of the case in the article are not so interesting to me, excepting how it might impact more legitimate uses of 1st sale. I do not support the defendant's actions.