3 ms·
"It's just kind of pointless, we're just going to create new ways to get on these platforms, so what's the point," said 14-year-old Claire Ni. Claire Ni conclu
by gloosx 10mo ago
"It's just kind of pointless, we're just going to create new ways to get on these platforms, so what's the point," said 14-year-old Claire Ni.
Claire Ni concluded it best. They are just going to find new ways. Imagine a kid stopping using something because of the law or government ban. Those lawmakers are just delusional if they think they can pass a law and the kids will stop using social media.
- morshu9001 10mo agoIf it has no effect, why complain?
- stevage 10mo agoIt can still be worth making a law even if some people find a way around it. Some teens will stop using social media as a result. That's enough.
- theshackleford 10mo agoThat’s like saying we should let children smoke because as a fifteen year old I was able to acquire cigarettes. I might have taken up smoking (to be fair I took it up when homeless from being around older homeless people who smoked) but a large cohort of my generation didn’t.